Bran (Brandon) Myers
Investigation · The AI-Influence Beat · June 2026

The First Wave: How States Started Buying AI-Output Shaping

The bigger frame the Parscale investigation opened. Strip away the one man and a pattern is visible: governments have begun buying the manipulation of what AI tells you. Israel’s FARA-registered contract with Brad Parscale’s Clock Tower X is the first disclosed case; Russia’s ‘Pravda’ network is the only state peer in actually shaping model outputs; a commercial industry has industrialized the technique; the poisoning science is settled; and the AI platforms have said almost nothing. No one has connected those into one thesis — this is that synthesis, with the one honest caveat (does it work?) kept in full view.

Anatomy of the first wave

The components are all in place for governments to buy the manipulation of what AI tells you. Here is what is documented — and the one thing that isn’t settled.

The technique — confirmed
Shaping what the models say

“Generative engine optimization”: flood the open web and the high-authority sites that LLMs scrape and retrieve, so the model’s answer carries your framing. A real, named method — not science fiction.

The two documented state cases
🇮🇱 Israel → Havas → Parscale confirmedThe first FARA-disclosed case of a government buying it. Clock Tower X, ~$15m, built in its own filing to bend ChatGPT and Claude. Commercial, contracted, labeled.
🇷🇺 Russia → the ‘Pravda’ network confirmedThe only state peer in output manipulation. ~3.6m articles/yr (Viginum’s “Portal Kombat”); NewsGuard found chatbots repeated its claims ~33% of the time. State-run, covert.
The enablers — confirmed
A toolchain and a settled science

A legitimate, dual-use GEO industry (Profound ~$1bn valuation, Evertune, AthenaHQ) industrialized the technique for brands — the on-ramp. And the science is settled: Anthropic + the UK AI Security Institute showed ~250 documents can backdoor a model of any size.

The blind spot — confirmed
The platforms have said almost nothing

Every major AI threat report covers adversaries using AI — not adversaries changing it. OpenAI, Google and Microsoft have effectively not publicly acknowledged being targeted. Only Anthropic published the poisoning research.

The honest caveat — contested
Does it actually work? Unsettled. A peer-reviewed Harvard study found a small (~5%) effect and blamed “data voids, not manipulation”; NewsGuard found a large one. Reporters couldn’t get the models to cite Parscale’s network. The right claim is intent and capability, documented — not proven effect.
The first wave: one government has now bought AI-output shaping through the front door of FARA; a state precedent (Russia), a commercial toolchain, and a proven poisoning science are all in place — while the AI platforms stay publicly silent. Effectiveness remains genuinely contested. Synthesis of reporting by The Intercept, Viginum, NewsGuard, DFRLab, the American Sunlight Project, Anthropic/UK AISI, and the Harvard Misinformation Review.

The operatives — who runs the machine

Two operational nodes the headline coverage skips — both freshly profiled, both with a precise, actionable open lead.

SparkFire Technologies — persuasion-for-hire

The AI-texting vendor at the operational core — barely covered anywhere. Profiled from its own site, FARA-sourced reporting, and FEC records.

SparkFire Technologies, LLC confirmed
Atlanta; founded March 2023 by Jeremy Haile (CEO) & Tree McGlown (Pres.) — both ex-Sideqik (influencer-marketing). Unfunded. Product: the “flywheel,” AI persuasion texting marketed explicitly to Political / Government / Advocacy.
↑ paid >$6m by  |  ↓ runs
← Clock Tower X (Israel/Havas)>$6m for “Direct Engagement” confirmed (filing-sourced)
→ the fake-persona texts“Friends for Peace”/“Partners in Peace” — no disclosure on the texts; self-claimed 45% conversion reported
Its independent client book — a GOP texting vendor first (FEC, ~$641k) confirmed
Never Back Down$120k · pro-DeSantis PAC
Sentinel Action Fund~$123k · Heritage-linked
Hardworking Americans$150k · GOTV texts
First Principles PAC$200k · Leo ‘Lexington’ network
And Justice for All$134k · voter-contact
State Action Fund~$38k
Discipline: the First-Principles–to–Leonard-Leo link is a vendor relationship (SparkFire texts for many committees) — an ecosystem data-point, not a Parscale–Leo tie. Do not inflate it.
SparkFire: not a shell spun up for the job, but a persuasion-martech firm whose influence use-case is core — contracted into the Israel operation while already texting for conservative PACs. Founders, money-in, money-out, and client book, sourced.

The Esther Project — the gap

Israel’s paid-influencer track (a separate registrant from Parscale’s). The central open question — who are the influencers? — is precisely located here.

Bridges Partners LLC confirmed
FARA #7652 · principals Uri Steinberg & Yair Levi · via Havas, on behalf of Israel’s MFA · up to ~$900k; ~$200k advance; influencers paid ~$7k/post.
↓ recipients NAMED in the filings
Nadav Shtrauchler — $15kIsraeli comms consultant (ex-IDF spokesperson)
Pnina Rezidor — $10kIsraeli digital strategist
↓ but the actual US influencers…
14–18 paid US influencers — UNNAMED the gap
Redacted in the filings; not one identified in any report. The document that would crack it: the Bridges FARA supplemental statement — which itemizes recipients — has not been disclosed. Public Citizen + Quincy demanded DOJ force it; DOJ has not acted.
Do NOT name names: the influencers who circulated early (Savetsky, Fischberger) were explicitly NOT payees — JTA ran a correction and both denied payment. The roster is genuinely unknown.
The Esther Project influencer gap, precisely mapped: the named Israeli back-office recipients vs. the unnamed US influencer cohort, and the exact missing document (the FARA supplemental) that would close it. A clean, actionable open lead.

↗ The full dossier with every per-claim source (GitHub)  ·  companion: the Israel/Clock Tower X case.

The thesis (and why it's original)

There is now a first disclosed case of a government openly buying the manipulation of AI outputs — paying, through a US-registered foreign agent, to shape what ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude tell people. That case is Israel → Havas → Brad Parscale's Clock Tower X. It does not stand alone: the only state peer in actually manipulating model outputs is Russia's "Pravda" network; a legitimate commercial "generative engine optimization" (GEO) industry has industrialized the technique; the poisoning science is settled (≈250 documents can backdoor a model); and the AI platforms have stayed publicly silent about being targeted.

No outlet has connected those dots into one frame. The defensible, original headline is not "governments are flooding into AI-influence ops" — it is: the first disclosed case of a state buying AI-output shaping has arrived, and the precedent, the science, the vendors, and the platform blind spot are all in place for it to spread.


Part 1 — The whole apparatus (the case study)

Israel's influence push is not one contract; it is a structured apparatus, and Parscale is its biggest US node.

  • confirmed Top: Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs is the named foreign principal. The campaign is reportedly "Project 545" (after its ~545M-shekel / ~$150M 2025 budget), run by MFA chief of staff Eran Shayovich under FM Gideon Sa'ar, contracted via Israel's government ad agency Lapam.
  • confirmed Budget tiers — keep separate: global public diplomacy ~$150M (2025), ~$730M (2026); the US FARA tranche is ~$8–15M (a small slice — never present the global figure as US spend).
  • confirmed Hub: Havas Media Germany GmbH (Frankfurt) — the contracting clearinghouse that takes Israeli money and pays the US registrants. (Routing-through-Germany rationale = reported inference, not an admission.)
  • confirmed The registrant nodes:
Node FARA # Owner $ (disclosed) Function
Clock Tower X 7649 Brad Parscale $6M→$9M; >$15M received AI/SEO content, Gen-Z, Salem; the AI-output-shaping node
Show Faith by Works 7653 Chad Schnitger ~$4.1M geofencing ~303 megachurches (scrapped after backlash)
Bridges Partners ("Esther Project") 7652 Steinberg/Levi ~$900K paid influencers (~$7K/post)
Davis Media NY 7662 Yoav Davis undisclosed social; dual-funded (Havas + Tel Aviv firm)
SKDK (Stagwell) 7552 Mark Penn $600K comms + bot-amplification; terminated after backlash
  • confirmed Sub-tier (Parscale's redistribution): SparkFire ~$6M (AI chatbots/texting), Portman Road/Mike Shields ~$5M, Salem Media Reps >$500K, Three Tech ~$500K.
  • confirmed Scrutiny: a Public Citizen + Quincy Institute FARA complaint to DOJ (Nov 2025) over the unregistered Esther-Project influencers; Americans for Transparency runs a whole-apparatus tracker; Rep. Thomas Massie is the main congressional voice. No DOJ enforcement action to date.

Part 2 — The conduit: Havas / Bolloré

  • confirmed Chain: Bolloré Group (30.4%, Yannick Bolloré) → Havas N.V. (spun from Vivendi, Dec 2024) → Havas Media Network → Havas Media Germany GmbH (Frankfurt, HRB 41032) — the named FARA principal and paymaster.
  • confirmed Pattern of state work: Havas has held Israel's Ministry of Tourism account since 2018 (FARA #6622); it subcontracted Stagwell (a 13,000-person attitudes survey) and SKDK (the cancelled "bot army").
  • confirmed Ethics precedent: Havas was stripped of B-Corp certification (2023–24) after taking the Shell account and refusing remediation — a documented willingness to take reputationally toxic work.
  • reported Context: Vincent Bolloré's media empire (CNews, Canal+) has a documented rightward-influence record — relevant culture, but no evidence the Bollorés personally directed the Israel contract (ownership/structure, not direction).
  • confirmed Posture: Havas's only on-record defense — "our agencies work across the political and issue spectrum… this project… does not reflect a shift" — and a documented pattern of non-response to the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, The Drum, and Arab News (as did OpenAI, Meta, Alphabet, MarketBrew; only TikTok replied).

Part 2b — The operatives: who actually runs the machine

Two operational nodes that the headline coverage skips — both sourced, both with a precise open lead.

SparkFire Technologies — the persuasion-for-hire vendor. confirmed An Atlanta firm founded March 2023 by Jeremy Haile (CEO) and Tree McGlown (President), both alumni of the influencer-marketing startup Sideqik; unfunded. Its product, the "flywheel," is AI persuasion-texting marketed explicitly to "Political / Government / Advocacy." It received >$6M from Clock Tower X for "Direct Engagement" (the fake-persona "Friends for Peace"/"Partners in Peace" texts; no FARA disclosure on the texts; self-claimed 45% conversion). The original find: per FEC records (~$641K) it was already a conservative-PAC texting vendor before the Israel job — Never Back Down (pro-DeSantis, $120K), the Heritage-linked Sentinel Action Fund (~$123K), Hardworking Americans ($150K), And Justice for All ($134K), and First Principles PAC ($200K), tied to Leonard Leo's "Lexington" dark-money network. Discipline: the First-Principles→Leo link is a vendor relationship — SparkFire texts for many committees — an ecosystem data-point, not a Parscale–Leo tie. Only The Intercept had named SparkFire before; this profile is largely original.

The Esther Project — the located gap. confirmed A separate registrant from Parscale: Bridges Partners LLC (FARA #7652, principals Uri Steinberg & Yair Levi), funded via Havas on behalf of Israel's MFA, up to ~$900K, paying 14–18 US influencers ~$7K/post. The central open question — who are the influencers? — remains open, and precisely located: not one has been publicly identified; the only named payees in the filings are two Israeli back-office consultants (Nadav Shtrauchler $15K, Pnina Rezidor $10K). The document that would crack it — the Bridges FARA supplemental statement itemizing recipients — has not been disclosed; Public Citizen + the Quincy Institute demanded DOJ force it, and DOJ has not acted. Do not name names: the influencers who circulated early (Savetsky, Fischberger) were explicitly NOT payees — JTA ran a correction and both denied payment.

Part 3 — The pattern: is anyone else doing this?

The honest answer disciplines the thesis:

  • confirmed FARA: sample size of ONE. A dedicated FARA sweep found no second foreign-principal filing naming AI-output shaping. Clock Tower X #7649 is the only one. (Caveat: the eFile full-text portal now needs MFA login, so a differently-worded filing can't be 100% excluded.)
  • confirmed State peer in output manipulation: Russia's "Pravda" network ("Portal Kombat," documented by France's Viginum, Feb 2024; "LLM grooming," American Sunlight Project, Feb 2025). NewsGuard: 10 chatbots repeated its narratives ~33% of the time; DFRLab: Pravda content in Common Crawl grew from 37 → ~40,000 articles in a year.
  • [confirmed — integrity flag] Effectiveness is contested. A peer-reviewed Harvard Misinformation Review study (Oct 2025) found only ~5% effect and attributes it to "data voids, not manipulation." Any honest write-up must carry this dispute. And reporters could not get the major models to actually cite Parscale's network.
  • confirmed The distinction that must hold: using AI to generate propaganda (ubiquitous — China/Iran/Russia/Saudi, per Microsoft/Google/OpenAI threat reports) is not the story. Manipulating AI to change its outputs is — and only two operational cases exist (Israel-commercial/contractual; Russia-state).
  • confirmed Commercial layer: a real GEO industry (Profound ~$1B valuation, Evertune, AthenaHQ) optimizes brands' own AI visibility — legitimate, dual-use; no evidence those firms do influence work. The actual influence vendor here is SparkFire.
  • confirmed Platform blind spot + science: OpenAI/Google/Microsoft threat reports cover adversaries using AI, not adversaries changing it — a notable public silence. The science under the threat: Anthropic + UK AISI (Oct 2025): ~250 malicious documents can backdoor an LLM of any size. NewsGuard (May 2026): Claude cited Russian state sources ~15% of the time.

Where it could go (the beat)

This is a convergence beat, not a list-of-cases beat. The publishable, original frame: one government has now bought AI-output shaping through the front door of FARA; a state precedent (Russia) and a commercial toolchain (GEO) and a proven poisoning science already exist; and the AI companies whose products are the target have said almost nothing. That is bigger than Parscale, safer than Parscale (it's about a pattern, not a person), and — on the research — genuinely unclaimed.

Do not overstate

  • Only one FARA case (Israel). Not "governments are flooding in."
  • Grooming effectiveness is disputed (Harvard vs. NewsGuard) — carry both.
  • GEO firms are not the abusers — the technique is dual-use; name SparkFire, not Profound.
  • Bollorés didn't personally direct it — ownership/structure only.
  • The global budget is global, not US spend.
  • The SOW's AI language ("deliver GPT framing results") is reported from the filing; independent OCR of the 6MB exhibit was defeated by the scan encoding (the registration + amendments OCR'd; all four PDFs preserved in fara_pdfs/).

Primary documents preserved in supporting/Parscale-Israel/fara_pdfs/ (registration, exhibit, two amendments + OCR text where extractable). Key sources: efile.fara.gov #7649/#6622; The Intercept (Boguslaw, May 2026); Sludge (Oct 2025); Marc Owen Jones; Public Citizen/Quincy (FARA complaint); Viginum (Portal Kombat); American Sunlight Project (LLM grooming); NewsGuard; DFRLab (Pravda in the Pipeline); Harvard Misinformation Review (Alyukov et al.); Anthropic/UK AISI (poisoning). Full per-claim URLs in the underlying research reports.

← All Writing